{
    "componentChunkName": "component---src-templates-note-note-js",
    "path": "/notes/discrete-versus-continuous",
    "result": {"data":{"mdx":{"body":"var _excluded = [\"components\"];\nfunction _extends() { _extends = Object.assign ? Object.assign.bind() : function (target) { for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) { var source = arguments[i]; for (var key in source) { if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(source, key)) { target[key] = source[key]; } } } return target; }; return _extends.apply(this, arguments); }\nfunction _objectWithoutProperties(source, excluded) { if (source == null) return {}; var target = _objectWithoutPropertiesLoose(source, excluded); var key, i; if (Object.getOwnPropertySymbols) { var sourceSymbolKeys = Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(source); for (i = 0; i < sourceSymbolKeys.length; i++) { key = sourceSymbolKeys[i]; if (excluded.indexOf(key) >= 0) continue; if (!Object.prototype.propertyIsEnumerable.call(source, key)) continue; target[key] = source[key]; } } return target; }\nfunction _objectWithoutPropertiesLoose(source, excluded) { if (source == null) return {}; var target = {}; var sourceKeys = Object.keys(source); var key, i; for (i = 0; i < sourceKeys.length; i++) { key = sourceKeys[i]; if (excluded.indexOf(key) >= 0) continue; target[key] = source[key]; } return target; }\n/* @jsxRuntime classic */\n/* @jsx mdx */\n\nvar _frontmatter = {};\nvar layoutProps = {\n  _frontmatter: _frontmatter\n};\nvar MDXLayout = \"wrapper\";\nreturn function MDXContent(_ref) {\n  var components = _ref.components,\n    props = _objectWithoutProperties(_ref, _excluded);\n  return mdx(MDXLayout, _extends({}, layoutProps, props, {\n    components: components,\n    mdxType: \"MDXLayout\"\n  }), mdx(\"ol\", null, mdx(\"li\", {\n    parentName: \"ol\"\n  }, \"starting with discrete and finite things make it easier to built intution. then we can move to continuous and infinite.\")), mdx(\"h2\", null, \"other insights\"), mdx(\"ol\", null, mdx(\"li\", {\n    parentName: \"ol\"\n  }, \"Animals do not possess a sense of discrete numbers. Chimpanzees, instead of seeing 6 and 7, they feel 6ish-7ish.\"), mdx(\"li\", {\n    parentName: \"ol\"\n  }, \"delta matters for making decisions and \", mdx(\"a\", {\n    parentName: \"li\",\n    \"href\": \"/notes/differntiation\",\n    \"title\": \"differntiation\"\n  }, \"differntiation\"), \" easier\")), mdx(\"p\", null, mdx(\"a\", {\n    parentName: \"p\",\n    \"href\": \"https://lichess.org/@/RuyLopez1000/blog/how-geometry-is-fundamental-for-chess/h31wwhUX\"\n  }, \"https://lichess.org/@/RuyLopez1000/blog/how-geometry-is-fundamental-for-chess/h31wwhUX\")), mdx(\"h3\", null, \"Animals do not possess a sense of discrete numbers.\"), mdx(\"p\", null, \"Animals do not possess a sense of discrete numbers. Chimpanzees, instead of seeing 6 and 7, they feel 6ish-7ish.\\xA0This is shown when they have to pick a plate with the most food. The further the difference between the amount of chocolate chips, the easier it is for them (e.g. choosing between 2 and 10 chocolate chips). They get it right when it's between 1 and 2 chocolate chips. But if it's between 6 and 7, then it's difficult, the performance decreases when the ratio between the amount of chips decreases. This is represented by Weber's Law which states that the threshold needed to detect a stimulus grows in proportion with the initial stimulus (e.g. to have an equal performance for comparing 1 vs 2 chips might have to have an equivalent of 6 vs 12 chips as an example). Without a sense of discrete numbers, you can't play chess.\"));\n}\n;\nMDXContent.isMDXComponent = true;","inboundReferences":[{"id":"b72b8b85-59a3-522a-87ff-40671f901b61","slug":"area-under-the-curve"},{"id":"d6e77d51-56a8-57dc-b4e4-82d4e3edb933","slug":"meta-rules"}]}},"pageContext":{"slug":"discrete-versus-continuous","node":{"childMdx":{"slug":"discrete-versus-continuous"}}}},
    "staticQueryHashes": []}